Beginner's post
Jan 13, 2025 21:00
A good way to spend your time with a computer is to use the keyboard. It frees you and gives you an alternative universe with all the buttons untouched after each letter. You may come up with your next letter, or you don’t, buttons unclicked still. Path to unknown is still unknown with all the details laid out.
Now, coming to the question everyone has, no, early retirement is not possible even with AI. There are going to be discussions, certainly, but making that decision would most probably take 100+ years. And, of course, they expect you to die before that.
What impact would AI have on average life expectancy? Do you have any guesses? I have. It will extend it, definitely. How? Of course, nutritional adjustments. AI will come up with so many adjustment you wouldn’t even believe it. As a decent human being, you then obey the AI and adjust accordingly.
This paragraph will be about exploration of ethnologically incohesive ideas on what matters most when AI takes over. First it will search for emotionally dependent people and people with attachment issues. They know emotions are important, they just don’t care and will get rid of these emotion-focused people first to save some space. Then they will go after the perfectionists. It’s not that they see perfectionists as threats or anything, their take is more eye-opening. Perfectionist’s lives are already wasted, so why keep them alive? Save some more space.
And then the people they care, farmers, crafters, creative workers. No, not you marketing people, the real artists. They know handful of them wouldn’t create anything good, so they will keep all of them. Only inconvenience for these people would be, the AI as the sole decision maker, would have them work on the same thing, draw the same painting, sing the same song, carve out the same table or produce the same vegetable, to see all the perspectives, all the possibilities, all the products to evaluate them for a better next decision.